It can take a while depending on the size of the document..please wait
Discuto


Transparency, Accountability and Integrity in the EU Institutions
0 days left (ends 25 Sep)
description
This is a first draft of the political suggestions and demands of my initiative report on: “Transparency, Accountability and Integrity in the EU Institutions”. It will be introduced through a more formal part which will be added once the political parts in finalized. We used this political opportunity to collect bold proposals to win back the shrinked trust of citizens in EU institutions. EU institutions should become THE example of clean, transparent and accountable politics. Ideally to achieve progress also for Member States’ institutions to overcome corruption and lack of transparency.
The collection and discussion of suggestions on this platform will be closed on the 25th of September so that enough time for the formal polishing of the report remains.
We ask all of you of your opinion on the proposed text (using the thumbs up or down or comments) and ideas (to add new ideas use the (+) symbol). We thank those a lot who already send their input via our online form found on sven-giegold.de/transparency and also those who contributed to the call of Democracy International. We tried to include your ideas nevertheless please continue making suggestions and corrections in this draft where you feel it would help our task.
I will read each and every of your comments which is formulated in a respectful and constructive way. Thanks in advance for all votes and comments!
With Green European greetings
Sven Giegold, Greens/EFA MEP and rapporteur of the initiative report
Further info
LATEST ACTIVITY
LEVEL OF AGREEMENT
MOST DISCUSSED PARAGRAPHS
-
P9 Requests bureau to propose an amendment to t
6 0
-
P3 Notes first evaluations of published data ab
6 20
-
P1 Welcomes the Commission’s decisions of 25.11
5 6
-
P33 Encourages and empowers the Joint Transparen
5 0
-
P49
With a view to full implementation of thos
4 8
-
P16 Regrets that so far Commission's intend for
4 9
-
P95
Considers that, following the entry into f
4 2
-
P30 calls on Joint Transparency Register Secreta
3 9
-
P130 takes note of the public discussion about th
3 5
-
P89 Recognises that strong reasons such as publi
3 7
-
P69 Believes the Code of Conduct should be amend
3 5
-
P61 Believes the internally chosen members of th
3 5
-
P23 Calls on all Member States to introduce a ma
3 0
-
conflicts of interest in Commission
3 7
-
P76 Believes for Members of the European Commiss
3 7
-
P91 Believes the TFEU’s exclusions from this oth
3 6
-
P86 Notes that complaints indicate this principl
3 6
-
P28 Believes another amendment should make manda
3 10
-
P88 Notes in that regard that although the defin
3 3
-
P20 Recognises the role played by the Council si
3 13
-
P97 Believes the ECB should also uphold the righ
2 4
-
P24 Welcomes progress made on the quality of the
2 12
-
P104
granting access to the information availab
2 3
-
P59 Encourages its President to give written exp
2 7
-
P10 Welcomes existing Lobbying laws forseeing ma
2 6
-
P100 Believes that the Ombudsman’s mandate as ind
2 4
-
P68 Believes the rule should imply more intense
2 5
-
P70 Believes violations of this Code of Conduct
2 5
-
P154 Calls on the Commission to draw up a framewo
2 2
-
P53
Considers that the structure and the staff
2 0
-
P6 Reaffirms the importance of the free mandate
2 11
-
Parliament should be as transparent as Commi
2 16
-
P92 Believes those who wilfully act to undermine
2 4
-
P4 Calls on the Commission to immediately exten
2 0
-
on the access to EU documents
2 10
-
P85 Believes the principle of widest possible op
2 9
-
P2 Considers this incentive for lobbyists to re
2 12
-
P87 Believes the principle should be understood
2 6
-
P109 Welcomes the Ombudsman’s inquiry into expert
2 5
-
P107
making EU documents more accessible by cre
2 4
-
P52
Welcomes and encourages the role played by
2 8
-
P25 Notes that despite efforts made so far plent
2 9
-
P115
Carefully assess individuals' backgrounds
2 3
-
P131 Considers that a reading room for confidenti
2 6
-
P31 Expects that the annual report on the operat
2 6
-
P15 Insists that the next review of the Transpar
2 11
-
P144 Believes effective whistleblower protection
1 0
-
P137 notes that preparatory documents are regular
1 1
-
P132 notes that some national parliamentarians en
1 5
-
P141 Regrets the Ombudsman found only two of nine
1 3
-
P90 Considers protection of human rights, agains
1 3
-
P142 Supports the reminder within the Commission’
1 4
-
P93 Believes the Regulation’s paragraph 14 of th
1 5
-
P98 Requests the Commission to negotiate when co
1 4
-
on transparency of the external representati
1 2
-
P110 Believes that concerning the selection of pa
1 4
-
P129 Requests all Chairs of its Committees to ens
1 0
-
recommendations on other institutions
1 2
-
P123 Notes how trilogues have become the rule ins
1 4
-
P99 Encourages all institutions to consider supp
1 5
-
on the fight against corruption involving th
1 5
-
P101
widening its scope to encompass all the EU
1 2
-
P112 Believes existing regulations concerning exp
1 2
-
P111
Welcomes the Commission's intention to fol
1 3
-
P145 Notes that corruption is found to cause sign
1 1
-
P108
ensuring that Parliament leads by example
1 0
-
P116
Ensure that no individual with any actual,
1 1
-
Extending the Commission’s Lobby transparenc
1 19
-
P81 Considers control by the European Parliament
1 4
-
P41 Requests its President and bureau to analyse
1 0
-
P7 Considers access of individual citizens and
1 11
-
burden sharing with Lobbyists for Lobby tran
1 9
-
P11 Considers lobby transparency via monthly rep
1 6
-
P12 Recognises debates on how far EU treaties al
1 0
-
P14 Considers that this and future reviews of th
1 16
-
P17 Reiterates its call of 14 April 2014 on the
1 11
-
P19 Considers that in any event, a further evalu
1 0
-
P26 Underlines that non-registered organisations
1 13
-
P27 Believes that the Code of Conduct attached t
1 9
-
P29 Requests the Joint Transparency Register Sec
1 10
-
P34 Considers among its members those appointed
1 9
-
P36 Regrets the present disincentive to publish
1 8
-
P37 Calls on its President and Bureau to explore
1 0
-
P40 Notes complains by members about areas of EU
1 7
-
sanctioning the Code of Conduct for lobbyist
1 10
-
P80 Considers the present regulation of 12.000 E
1 4
-
P64 Requests its President to arrange for the im
1 5
-
P79 Recognises progress in transparency of finan
1 3
-
P77 Believes similar rules must also apply to se
1 6
-
P75 centralised publication to allow for compari
1 0
-
P74 publication in machine readable format,
1 7
-
P71 Believes that the Code of Conduct attached t
1 3
-
P66 Encourages its Bureau to propose ways to ins
1 4
-
P63 Believes Rules of Procedure’s articles on de
1 4
-
lawyers who lobby
1 9
-
P58 Requests its President to publish all recomm
1 10
LATEST COMMENTS
MOST ACTIVE USERS
![]() |
0 | 1 |
![]() |
0 | 1 |



P50
- Asks former Members of the European Parliament to comply with the relevant provisions when carrying out activities falling within the scope of the Transparency Register; believes that in carrying out such activities, former Members should not use their Members' badge to access the premises of the European Parliament; requests the Bureau to present to the Conference of Presidents a proposal for appropriate measures to prevent misuse of privileges to which former Members are entitled;
Add/View comment (1)

P51
- With a view to full implementation of those measures, welcomes the intention by its Bureau to format the above mentioned advice into an easy to understand handout to be included in all welcoming of new members and recruitment of new staff;
Add comment
register’s secretariat
P52
- Welcomes and encourages the role played by non-institutional watchdogs in monitoring the transparency of the EU Institutions yet believes the good functioning of the register should not rely on them;
Add/View comments (2)


P53
- Considers that the structure and the staff of the Joint Transparency Register Secretariat need to be reinforced in order to implement the new provisions in the modified agreement, to deal with the procedures for alerts and for the investigation and treatment of complaints, and to improve the procedures for verifying the reliability of information provided by registrants;
Add/View comments (2)


Inclusion of regional and local representations in the register
P54
- Recognises the difference between governmental actors independent of their level national, regional or local from non-governmental, private or corporate actors;
Add comment
P55
- Considers some practices within national, regional and local representations a distortion of the otherwise clear distinction that have to be ended in order to allow an exemption from obligations of the transparency register
Add/View comment (1)

P56
- Those practises to be avoided include:
- staff in national, regional or local represenatations that serves within the frame of temporary internships, exchange programs or similar yet otherwise working for non-governental or corporate actors,
- workspace and IT within the premises of national, regional or local represenations that is left to or shared with non-governmental, private or corporate actors;
Add comment
conflicts of interest
P57
- Notes that despite several recommendations by the Advisory Committee on the Conduct of Members to sanction Members of the European Parliament its President decided not to follow any of those recommendations;
Add/View comment (1)

P58
- Requests its President to publish all recommendations given by the Advisory Committee on the Conduct of Members;
Add/View comment (1)
P59
- Encourages its President to give written explanation for each case when not following the recommendation of the advisory body on the code of conduct;
Add/View comments (2)


P60
- Believes those Members of the Advisory Committee recruited from amoung the European Parliament’s members should be elected by the Political Group they represent and not to be appointed by its President;
Add comment
P61
- Believes the internally chosen members of the Advisory Committee should be complemented by a majority of externally chosen members;
Add/View comments (3)
P62
- Requests its Bureau to propose a procedure for selecting external members of the Advisory Committee;
Add comment
P63
- Believes Rules of Procedure’s articles on declarations of financial interest of Members should be amended to
- do away with categories while declaring incomes and instead to ask for declaration of precise amounts;
Add/View comment (1)

P64
- Requests its President to arrange for the improvement of the process towards the filing and publishing of declarations of financial interests including
- encouraging to file declarations via a dedicated software instead of hand writing,
- publication in machine readable format,
- centralised publication to allow for comparision of content;
Add/View comment (1)

P65
- Notes the tendency among member states to introduce independent agents to check declarations of interest by Parliamentarians and high ranking public officials and sanction breaches of Codes of Conduct;
Add comment
P66
- Encourages its Bureau to propose ways to institutionalise checking declarations of interest and sanctioning the code of conduct by neutral third parties with expertise instead of by fellow Members of Parliament;
Add/View comment (1)

Did you know you can vote on comments? You can also reply directly to people's comments.