Discuto is Loading your document from Drive

It can take a while depending on the size of the document..please wait

Discuto is submitting your document

It might take a while depending on the size of the document you uploaded..

Discuto is creating your discussion

Please do not close this window.

Discuto is submitting your comment

Did you know you can vote on comments? You can also reply directly to people's comments.

Your invites are being queued for sending

This might take some time depending on the number of invites, please do not close this window.

Discuto

Discuto

Bringing the EU Strategy for the Danube Region to life

Starting: 24 Apr Ending

0 days left (ends 30 Jun)

Go to discussion, participate and give your opinion

description

Dear participant of the discussion on the EUSDR,

we thank you very much for your willingness to take part. Your contributions will help us to make better recommendations on how the EU Strategy for the Danube Region can be better brought to life.

Below you can find a series of statements which came out of focus groups (moderator-led discussions) with representatives from all the countries of the Danube Region. We would like to ask you to vote on the statements by clicking on the respective icons on the right of the statements. We would be especially happy if you could also comment on the statements or make further suggestion. Besides you, we invited a series of other experts. We hope that from your comments and those from the other participants a lively discussion will arise.

The statements below refer mainly to the catching-up countries of the Danube Region which are basically the non-German speaking countries. Thus, if you encounter terms like “the countries” or “the eastern countries” then this refers to the non-German speaking area of the Danube Region.

The statements are summarised in five broad sections. The first relates to the problems with project identification and implementation. In the second criteria for projects are mentioned and the third covers comments on the EUSDR in general. Then we also have extracted thematic fields and concrete projects from the focus group (Section 4 and 5).

You will note that the statements are not necessarily consistent. This is intended in order to present the different views for the specific topic.

More information about the project can be found here. The final report is available here

LATEST ACTIVITY

LEVEL OF AGREEMENT

    • 80%
    • (3688 positive votes)
    • 20%
    • (949 negative votes)
  • 4637 votes in total
  • Most voted: 20
  • Most commented: 20
  • Most controversial: 20
  • Already decided: 0
  • In voting: 0
  • Supported: 59
  • My contributions: 0

MOST DISCUSSED PARAGRAPHS

LATEST COMMENTS

No activity yet

MOST ACTIVE USERS

Status: Closed
Privacy: Public

CONTRIBUTORS (89)

+61
Share:
<< Previous paragraphs

P17

  • There is no social acceptance of business failure.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (3)

P18

  • The behaviour of people is opportunistic, not strategic. This means: When they set up a business they are eager to benefit from financing opportunities without having a business plan or the will to pursue a business opportunity. Money is seen as a goal in itself but not as a means to develop a business.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comment (1)

people_img

P19

  • Risk-aversion is very widespread in the population. This is an obstacle to entrepreneurship. Another consequence is that people prefer working for the government and not in the business world.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comment (1)

people_img

P20

  • There is a lack of initiative on the part of individuals.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (3)

P21

  • Firms lack a long-term orientation because there are too many incentives in the system of rules and regulations for short-term gains. This hinders the pursuit of long-term projects. A sign of the short-term orientation of the firms is that they invest little in R&D.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (2)

people_imgpeople_img

P22

  • All big companies in the countries that are part of the global value chain are foreign owned. The place of the domestic companies is defined only in relation to these big foreign owned companies.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (3)

people_imgpeople_imgpeople_img

P23

  • The involvement of the local firms in the production processes of the eastern countries of the Danube Region is also too low. Western investors do not find enough reliable local suppliers. There is still a too strong focus on the part of policy makers on FDIs of big companies and on large companies in general and a comparatively weak focus on SMEs.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (2)

people_imgpeople_img

P24

  • Local businesses suffer from a lack of reputation. They also face severe obstacles to build up their reputation because often foreign owned companies, which already had time to establish a reputation (e.g., Siemens), get the projects. This problem holds for all sectors of the economy, not only for manufacturing.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (3)

people_imgpeople_imgpeople_img

P25

  • Initiatives or support for SMEs and start-ups in the individual countries only target the local market, instead of having a more global scope.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (2)

people_imgpeople_img

P26

  • SMEs are very small (mostly micro-entreprises). This makes it difficult for them to participate in international trade and in innovation processes.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (2)

people_imgpeople_img

P27

  • Sound craft producers are missing in the eastern part of the Danube Region.
You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P28

  • FDIs are increasingly knowledge-intensive. However, they encapsulate themselves so that the knowledge and technology transfer to the local economy is limited if existent at all.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (2)

people_imgpeople_img

P29

  • What is missing in the countries are local companies which are leaders in their field and which can stand at the centre of innovation systems. A reason for this is that SMEs are not very technology and knowledge intensive.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (3)

people_imgpeople_imgpeople_img

P30

  • Companies in the eastern countries do not know how to apply for EU funds. In addition, they are unable to cope with the administration which comes along with writing a proposal in order to get EU funding.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (2)

people_imgpeople_img

P31

  • There is a mismatch of demand and supply of high-skilled labour, especially in technical fields. (Supply of high skilled labour force is limited, especially engineers and technicians are missing.) This leads to that especially the highly educated leave the countries or work in jobs that do not correspond to their qualification.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comment (1)

people_img

P32

  • There is a dramatic brain drain from the countries. Additionally, especially the Balkan countries are not attractive for people to move there. The main reason why people leave their country is the high degree of corruption in the whole society.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (2)

people_imgpeople_img

P33

  • Eastern countries of the Danube Region market themselves poorly. The image of the countries in the western part of the Danube Region/the EU does not correspond to the actual business conditions. These are often better than perceived in the western part of the EU.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (2)

people_imgpeople_img

P34

  • There is a growing critical attitude related to foreign capital, big business and especially banks in the countries. In earlier years there existed a high level of optimism regarding East-West economic relations. Now scepticism prevails which makes projects with partners from the East and West of the Danube Region difficult.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comment (1)

people_img

2 Criteria for projects