Discuto is Loading your document from Drive

It can take a while depending on the size of the document..please wait

Discuto is submitting your document

It might take a while depending on the size of the document you uploaded..

Discuto is creating your discussion

Please do not close this window.

Discuto is submitting your comment

Did you know you can vote on comments? You can also reply directly to people's comments.

Your invites are being queued for sending

This might take some time depending on the number of invites, please do not close this window.

Discuto

Discuto

Bringing the EU Strategy for the Danube Region to life

Starting: 24 Apr Ending

0 days left (ends 30 Jun)

Go to discussion, participate and give your opinion

description

Dear participant of the discussion on the EUSDR,

we thank you very much for your willingness to take part. Your contributions will help us to make better recommendations on how the EU Strategy for the Danube Region can be better brought to life.

Below you can find a series of statements which came out of focus groups (moderator-led discussions) with representatives from all the countries of the Danube Region. We would like to ask you to vote on the statements by clicking on the respective icons on the right of the statements. We would be especially happy if you could also comment on the statements or make further suggestion. Besides you, we invited a series of other experts. We hope that from your comments and those from the other participants a lively discussion will arise.

The statements below refer mainly to the catching-up countries of the Danube Region which are basically the non-German speaking countries. Thus, if you encounter terms like “the countries” or “the eastern countries” then this refers to the non-German speaking area of the Danube Region.

The statements are summarised in five broad sections. The first relates to the problems with project identification and implementation. In the second criteria for projects are mentioned and the third covers comments on the EUSDR in general. Then we also have extracted thematic fields and concrete projects from the focus group (Section 4 and 5).

You will note that the statements are not necessarily consistent. This is intended in order to present the different views for the specific topic.

More information about the project can be found here. The final report is available here

LATEST ACTIVITY

LEVEL OF AGREEMENT

    • 80%
    • (3688 positive votes)
    • 20%
    • (949 negative votes)
  • 4637 votes in total
  • Most voted: 0
  • Most commented: 0
  • Most controversial: 0
  • Already decided: 0
  • In voting: 0
  • Supported: 59
  • My contributions: 0

MOST DISCUSSED PARAGRAPHS

LATEST COMMENTS

No activity yet

MOST ACTIVE USERS

Status: Closed
Privacy: Public

CONTRIBUTORS (89)

+61
Share:
<< Previous paragraphs

P139

  • Establishment of a fund for financing feasibility studies
You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P140

  • Mapping of the value and supply chains for manufacturing sectors across countries in order to find out where and how an upgrading can take place
You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P141

  • Establishment of cross-country vine clusters
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (3)

P142

  • Establishment/Intensifying exchange programmes for students, trainees and junior officials from the more eastern countries with the western countries, especially Germany and Austria, of the Danube Region
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comment (1)

people_img

P143

  • Improvement of the partnerships of cities
You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P144

  • Expansion of the Twinning idea on other areas than development of administrative structures
You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P145

  • Establishment of technology transfer centres in order to increase the knowledge transfer between universities and SMEs
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comments (2)

P146

  • Development of a platform in order to improve the skills of companies to apply for EU funds
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comment (1)

P147

  • Establishment of alumni networks in order to keep in contact with people who left the country. In that way migrants can serve as source of knowledge. These alumni networks should not be restricted to universities or schools but also companies and the public administration should establish such networks.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comment (1)

people_img

P148

  • Using crowdfunding as a means for selecting interesting business ideas
You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P149

  • Development of a Centre for Entrepreneurial Learning like the SEECEL (South East European Centre for Entrepreneurial Learning) of the Regional Cooperation Council for the whole Danube Region.
You agreeCan't vote

Add/View comment (1)

people_img