Discuto is Loading your document from Drive

It can take a while depending on the size of the document..please wait

Discuto is submitting your document

It might take a while depending on the size of the document you uploaded..

Discuto is creating your discussion

Please do not close this window.

Discuto is submitting your comment

Did you know you can vote on comments? You can also reply directly to people's comments.

Your invites are being queued for sending

This might take some time depending on the number of invites, please do not close this window.

Discuto

Discuto

one more test discussion

Starting: 22 Aug Ending

0 days left (ends 29 Aug)

Go to discussion, participate and give your opinion

description

Further info

LATEST ACTIVITY

LEVEL OF AGREEMENT

    • 0%
    • (0 positive votes)
    • 0%
    • (0 negative votes)
  • 0 votes in total
  • Most voted: 0
  • Most commented: 0
  • Most controversial: 0
  • Already decided: 0
  • In voting: 0
  • Supported: 0
  • My contributions: 0

MOST DISCUSSED PARAGRAPHS

No activity yet

LATEST COMMENTS

No activity yet

MOST ACTIVE USERS

No activity yet
Status: Closed
Privacy: Public

CONTRIBUTORS (2)

Share:
<< Previous paragraphs

P19

As proposed in the 2012 BEREC NN QoS Guidelines [2], the measurement methods shall encompass both the IAS as a whole, as well as individual applications using it. The methodology supports both IPv4 and IPv6 - this topic is further discussed where necessary.

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P20

The aim of this chapter is to specify the measurement methodology best practices with the combined goal of maximising measurement accuracy and to ensure that the measurement results are comparable between different member states.

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P21

Results of these measurements can be also used for the following purposes:

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P22

• Empowering the end user to validate the commitments made to them from their IAS provider.

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P23

• Monitoring the general IAS quality and confirming that the performance of IAS is developing sufficiently over time when taking into account technological evolution.

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P24

• To support the detection of any prioritisation and/or throttling of selected applications compared to other applications running over IAS.

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P25

• NRAs may also use the data to increase transparency (e.g. interactive maps showing performance in a geographic area).

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P26

According to BEREC NN guidelines [3] paragraph 166, speed should be calculated “based on IP packet payload, e.g. using TCP as transport layer protocol” and according to the NN guidelines paragraph 140, an ISP should define the speed on the basis of the IP packet payload or transport layer protocol payload.

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P27

This methodology is targeted to measure IAS quality in both the upload and download direction. It is worth noting that IAS speed is just one component of the performance experienced by the end users, since different applications have different protocol overheads and different requirements related to IAS delay, delay variation and packet loss.

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P28

For both measurement tasks - IAS as a whole and individual applications using IAS - the fundamental precondition is that measurements are performed at the edge of the network which provides the IAS (i.e. end user premises for fixed access or via the radio access for Mobile IAS).

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P29

Where measurements are performed against a test server, this server should be located outside the IAS network. It should have adequate connectivity between the server and the IAS provider to avoid influencing measurements. In general it is recommended that the measurement server should be located at the national Internet exchange point (IXP) unless there is specific reason for its placement elsewhere.

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P30

Monitoring mechanisms should mitigate, to the extent possible, confounding factors which are internal to the user environment. Examples of these factors include existing cross-traffic and the usage of Wi-Fi based interfaces. This topic is discussed separately in chapter 5.

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P31

The assessment of measurement results is discussed further in chapter 6 and the certified monitoring mechanism is further discussed in chapter 7.

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

3.1.1Speed measurement overall methodology

P32

In order to maximise compatibility in a real world environment, it is recommended to measure upload/download speeds based on the time to execute a set of controlled file transfers over HTTP.

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P33

This methodology is supported by the broadest range of platforms, and can be implemented within a web browser or within the restricted sandbox of an on-device app. As such it is considered to be the best compromise between the competing demands of accuracy, platform agnosticism, ease of implementation and transparency.

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P34

Another reason to recommend the use of HTTP is to mitigate any firewall based restrictions which may result from the choice of a less commonly used protocol/port. The use of HTTPS also prevents manipulation from proxies[1].

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment

P35

In order to saturate the path, it is recommended to use 3-5 HTTP connections. Furthermore, these connections should all have completed the TCP slow start phase to maximise throughput and ensure that the measurement is as representative as possible. The test is stopped after a pre-defined interval and the transfer speed is calculated by the recipient based on the data transferred over that interval.

You agreeCan't vote

Add comment